Gun free zones, what's the point, except to make the sheep feel secure? A false comfort, folks.
Since there's a much better likelihood no one will have the means to shoot back, potential terrorists--like the one recently arrested in nearby Massachusetts and who may have targeted malls filled with kaffirs (Islamic term meaning unbelievers) sending money to the Great Satan (US and its gubmit)--are interested in using these places for a, ah, "dramatic" statement. That's looking at it from the perspective of the Jihadist, though.
If it's true, as I think it is, then places like the Mall of New Hampshire, might want to reconsider their policy of being "gun free." I have heard that there are posted signs not permitting customers from possessing a concealed firearm, regardless of the fact they have a valid permit and it's not illegal, while one is on the premises.
If I were a bored class action lawyer and a horrific incident occurred at such a place, I'd explore the legality of putting together a large, hefty class action suit against the management of such a place who instituted that law.
As John R. Lott has written, all mass shootings of three or more people over the past few years have all occurred at gun free zones. And you may remember a shooting in Salt Lake City, Utah, a few years ago where a young man, a Bosnian immigrant, with a knapsack filled with ammo and several guns shot and killed a few people before he ran into an off-duty cop who happened to be carrying.
Do you remember that one? Few have. But I look at it like the assassination of controversial right-wing Jewish nationalist Rabbi Meir Kahane, the first bloodshed spilt by Al-Qaeda in America. A portentous harbinger of things to come? (Was I just redundant there?)
If I were to go to such a place as the Mall of NH, I would almost certainly disregard such posted signs, much as I did hobbling into the Speare Memorial Hospital in Plymouth, NH, a little over a year ago after stepping on a nail and needing a tetanus booster.
Life is too sacred not to be able to defend. I won't bother telling you what I do when traveling in Massachusetts or Rhode Island. That wouldn't be prudent.
Since there's a much better likelihood no one will have the means to shoot back, potential terrorists--like the one recently arrested in nearby Massachusetts and who may have targeted malls filled with kaffirs (Islamic term meaning unbelievers) sending money to the Great Satan (US and its gubmit)--are interested in using these places for a, ah, "dramatic" statement. That's looking at it from the perspective of the Jihadist, though.
If it's true, as I think it is, then places like the Mall of New Hampshire, might want to reconsider their policy of being "gun free." I have heard that there are posted signs not permitting customers from possessing a concealed firearm, regardless of the fact they have a valid permit and it's not illegal, while one is on the premises.
If I were a bored class action lawyer and a horrific incident occurred at such a place, I'd explore the legality of putting together a large, hefty class action suit against the management of such a place who instituted that law.
As John R. Lott has written, all mass shootings of three or more people over the past few years have all occurred at gun free zones. And you may remember a shooting in Salt Lake City, Utah, a few years ago where a young man, a Bosnian immigrant, with a knapsack filled with ammo and several guns shot and killed a few people before he ran into an off-duty cop who happened to be carrying.
Do you remember that one? Few have. But I look at it like the assassination of controversial right-wing Jewish nationalist Rabbi Meir Kahane, the first bloodshed spilt by Al-Qaeda in America. A portentous harbinger of things to come? (Was I just redundant there?)
If I were to go to such a place as the Mall of NH, I would almost certainly disregard such posted signs, much as I did hobbling into the Speare Memorial Hospital in Plymouth, NH, a little over a year ago after stepping on a nail and needing a tetanus booster.
Life is too sacred not to be able to defend. I won't bother telling you what I do when traveling in Massachusetts or Rhode Island. That wouldn't be prudent.
Leave a comment