McDonald V. Chicago

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
I'm hopping in my seat in excitement, esp. in response to the new-found conservative activism of the Roberts court. Unlike the incrementalism of the past, the Chief Justice must realize time is not on the conservatives' side. Unlike my Buddhist way of minimizing or not having expectations, I do with this momentous Second Amendment decision, which is a logical outgrowth of Heller. I plan on exercising my Second Amendment rights for my brother's DC wedding next year. 'Nuff said.

McDonald V. Chicago or, "The Chicago Gun Case," even has its own website, chicagoguncase.com. A town prohibiting handguns, huh? Funny how that works in the bad guys' favor.

If I'm disappointed, esp. grievously so, you'll suspect how I'll act.

The Cato Institute issued a fine brief, according to Dave Kopel. Not surprising since the legal director Roger Pilon is top-notch. I saw him intellectually demolish Marcus Raskin, a notable lefty given a hagiography in a Boston Globe piece shortly after for his lifetime work. I mean Pilon _demolished_ him in August 1990 at American University in DC. I hadn't seen such a thing since Immanuel Kant dispatched the Ontological Proof for God's Existence so thoroughly.

Monday, Jan. 18, G. Gordon Liddy spoke with Alan Gottlieb, of the Second Amendment Foundation, on this podcast about the Second Amendment. It's patently ridiculous the games the District of Columbia has been playing in preventing citizens from exercising their rights in response to Heller. Heel dragging all the way.

Gottlieb's organization is on the offensive to repeal municipalities' draconian and un-Constitutional efforts to stamp out the Second Amendment.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: McDonald V. Chicago.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://weekendpundit.org/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/782

Leave a comment

New Additions

Expatriate New Englanders

Other Blogs We Like That Don't Fit Into Any One Category

Sitemeter

    -->
Powered by Movable Type 4.1